In order to gain an understanding of paradoxical interventions, it is important to define our terms. Since paradoxical interventions have historically been difficult to explain, we offer 2 concise definitions; one from a more familiar psychological perspective, and the second through the lens of a more scientific model based on ‘orbits-gravity phenomena’. In defining our terms, we also provide a definition for the ‘treatment–resistant client’:
The psychological definition and the scientific definition are mutually supportive. Both definitions say the same thing, however, the first definition is more within the familiar realm of current psychological jargon.
The second definition incorporates a more ‘scientific’ approach based on ‘orbit-gravity phenomenon’. By offering a parallel definition based on an ‘orbits-gravity’ model, we allude to an alternative way to conceptualize psychological phenomena. As will be shown, it is through this second definition that we are able to diagram the ‘process of change’. The model also suggests a viable connection and overlap between psychological ideas and phenomena observed in the natural sciences (astronomy, biology, chemistry, physics).
Definition 1 (Psychological)
The paradoxical approach is a counter-intuitive method that is effective for working with a variety of treatment-resistant individuals.
The method represents the logical extension of ‘attachment theory’ and focuses exclusively on avoiding power struggles and enhancing the therapeutic alliance.
By providing resolution and relief to primary attachment trauma issues, the method alters the client’s status-quo perception of self and others. This in turn acts as a catalyst for inducing shifts in a full range of (secondary) dysfunctional behavioral, cognitive, and emotional functioning.
Definition 2 (Scientific)
The paradoxical approach can be expressed through the science and logic of ‘orbits-gravity phenomena’ as a way to conceptualize and resolve treatment-resistance.
The method represents the extension of ‘orbits-gravity theory’ in which ‘orbits’ are viewed as repetitive energy or behavior, along with ‘gravity’ as the central force that ‘attaches, bonds, and connects’.
The model indicates that by simply placing primary emphasis on strengthening ‘gravity’ (attachment), it is possible to shift the client’s status-quo equilibrium. This in turn acts as a catalyst to induce shifts in a full range of (secondary) rigid ‘orbits’ of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional functioning.
Defining the Treatment Resistant Client
The treatment-resistant client is the person who has no overt intent or desire to change his behavior. This client may be unconscious or unaware of the destructiveness of his actions. The treatment-resistant client seeks to maintain his status-quo equilibrium in an effort to perpetuate his familiar identity and behavior.
www.ParadoxPsychology.com EPK Revised: 10-09
